Sign up or login to use the bookmarking feature.

Writing Assessment for Teachers

“Students are more engaged when indicators of success are clearly spelled out.”
—Judith Zorfass & Harriet Copel

Effective writing assessment begins with clear expectations. Share with your students the qualities of effective writing—structure, ideas, and conventions. Using the qualities is easy. Just assess writing with one of these qualities-based assessment tools: a teacher rating sheet, a general writing rubric, or a mode-specific rubric for narrative, explanatory, persuasive, literature response, or research writing.

Also check out these other assessment supports:

Formative Writing Assessment

Writing assessment should not occur only at the end of a project. Instead, you should provide students ongoing feedback throughout the writing process. Give informal comments and focus on the first two qualities of writing: structure and ideas. These traits capture the key parts of communication: what a writer is saying (ideas) and how the writer is saying it (structure). Check for conventions during the editing phase, for if you comment on spelling and punctuation before content, student will focus on surface corrections rather than the deeper issues that facilitate true communication.

You can provide this formative assessment during different types of writing conferences:

  • Desk-Side Conferences occur when you stop at a student’s desk to ask questions and make responses. Questions should be open-ended. This gives the writer “space” to talk and clarify his or her own thinking about the writing.
  • Scheduled Conferences give you and a student a chance to meet for 3 to 5 minutes in a more structured setting. In such a conference, a student may have a specific problem or need to discuss or simply want you to assess his or her progress on a particular piece of writing.
  • Small-Group Conferences give you a chance to meet with three to five students who are at the same stage of the writing process or are experiencing a similar problem. The goal of such conferences is twofold: first, to help students improve their writing and, second, to help them become better assessors.

Summative Writing Assessment

Don't feel the need to grade everything that students write. Trying to do so would not only be overwhelming but also counterproductive. The work students do during prewriting, writing, revising, and editing should not be graded as such because doing so would short-circuit the students' ability to write freely and communicate ideas. Also, writing-to-learn activities such as note taking and journaling should not be rigorously graded. You can give a score based on whether students produce a quantity of such material, but you should not do a full-trait evaluation on it. Students need to be able to write to learn new concepts and to gain fluency rather than worrying about every sentence, word, and comma.

Decide which assignments require summative assessment, and then grade the writing following this process:

  • Ask students to submit prewriting and rough drafts with their final drafts.
  • Scan final drafts once, focusing on the writing as a whole.
  • Reread them, this time assessing them using the qualities of writing.
  • Make marginal notations, if necessary, as you read the drafts a second time.
  • Scan the writing a third and final time. Note the feedback you have given.
  • Complete your rating sheet or rubric, and, if necessary, write a summary comment.

Good writing assessment takes time. There is no magic button to push. Thankfully, you can reduce the burden on yourself by teaching your students to assess writing as well. This practice not only lightens your load but, more importantly, makes your students better writers.